Stockholders Suits Cases
Foster et al v. Abercrombie et al
as 5:2011cv00180
Plaintiff: Norris Foster , Noah Alpern and Louis Alpern
Defendant: George B. Abercrombie , Adrian Adams , Kip A. Frey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERSTE-SPARINVEST KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv03242
Plaintiff: ERSTE-SPARINVEST KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
Defendant: SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, HANS W. BECHERER, THOMAS J. COLLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Type: Contract Plaintiff
RUBERY v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv03244
Plaintiff: CATHERINE RUBERY
Defendant: SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP., FRED HASSAN, HANS W. BECHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Type: Contract None
MANSON v. BECHERER et al
as 2:2009cv03251
Plaintiff: F. RICHARD MANSON
Defendant: HANS W. BECHERER, THOMAS J. COLLIGAN, FRED HASSAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Type: Contract Plaintiff
MURPHY v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv03275
Plaintiff: ARTHUR I. MURPHY, JR.
Defendant: SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP., FRED HASSAN, HANS W. BECHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Type: Contract Plaintiff
HUSARSKY v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.
as 2:2009cv01244
Plaintiff: DAVID HUSARSKY and DAVID HUSARSKY
Defendant: SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP., HANS W. BECHERER, THOMAS J. COLLIGAN and others
Movant: LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
LANDESBANK BERLIN INVESTMENT GmbH v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01099
Plaintiff: LANDESBANK BERLIN INVESTMENT GmbH
Defendant: SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, HANS W. BECHERER, THOMAS J. COLLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?