Cases 31 - 40 of 846
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5041
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Head of the United States Department of Justice. Named in is official capacity, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
BEIKZADEH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
HOSSEIN BEIKZADEH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL TORONTO, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Michael E. Horowitz, O.I.G, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
