Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jallal v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Jallad
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, sec.gov/Chair Gary Gensler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Mokuolu v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Oluwaseyi Mokuolu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Nosav v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Yury Nosav
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
