Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Iqbal et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 5:2024cv00920
Defendant:
Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B Garland
Plaintiff:
Malak Dabboussi and Hamza Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harmon v. Biden et al
as 6:2024cv00205
Defendant:
Mike Johnson, Gentner Drummond, Nowata County Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Clark Harmon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NAJAFBEYGI v. MAYORKAS et al
as 5:2024cv00559
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and others
Plaintiff:
MILAD NAJAFBEYGI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00527
Respondent:
Markenzy Lapointe, United States of America and Merrick B Garland
Petitioner:
George J. Sebastian III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
NASIHATKON v. MAYORKAS et al
as 5:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
SEYEDMOHAMMADALI NASIHATKON
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
