Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Cook v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Shaun M. Cook
Defendant:
Nancy Gallagher, William Griffin, Robert Hage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levesque v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections
as 1:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Andre R. Levesque
Defendant:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections
as 1:2010fp00149
Plaintiff:
Shaun M. Cook
Defendant:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palermo v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2008cv00127
Petitioner:
Christopher M. Palermo
Respondent:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Palermo v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Palermo
Defendant:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, Jim Lewko, Bill Plenge and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Palermo et al v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Palermo
Defendant:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent and FNU Parent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bradley v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
Richard Bradley
Defendant:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jerez v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2007fp00007
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jerez
Defendant:
Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
