Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
TACCINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff:
VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUPERIOR ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al v. GENERAL COUNSEL, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Superior Architecture and Construction, LLC and Daniel Steinkoler
Defendant:
General Counsel, P.C., Merritt Green and ANDREW BAXTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
