Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03661
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02941
Defendant:
JESSICA HURST, MATTHEW ZECHMAN, JOHN SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEAL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02926
Defendant:
OFFICER PANARA, JOHN DOES, OFFICER WONG and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEAL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. ALLAN , VICTOR AMBURGY , JUDY COX BARKELY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. BROWN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , VA MEDICAL CENTER and DR. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COBB v. GRAY et al
as 1:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. COBB
Defendant:
VINCENT C. GRAY, JIM GRAHAM, JACK EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUEZADA v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. QUEZADA
Defendant:
SUE MARSHALL , VINCENT C. GRAY , KWAME R. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL et al v. WACKENHUT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2011cv02158
Plaintiff:
ADAM HILL , TODD ASHTON HARVILLE , DAVID BOND and others
Defendant:
WACKENHUT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, KELLOG-BROWN & ROOT, LLC and HALLIBURTON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2010cv01753
Petitioner:
MICHAEL L. BROWN
Respondent:
GUY PIERCE, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, MICHAEL WALLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
