Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOMPSON v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2019cv06210
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROLAND THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SINANAN v. TASCHNER et al
as 5:2017cv03772
Defendant:
KRISTINE M.L. BLAKE, TOM MIGLIORE, RORY B. DRISCOLE and others
Plaintiff:
ALLAN L. SINANAN, JR.
Petitioner:
BRIAN MONAHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALMATIA IMPORT GROUP, INC. v. FOODMATCH, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02767
Plaintiff:
DALMATIA IMPORT GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
FOODMATCH, INC. , LANCASTER FINE FOODS, INC. , EARTH PRIDE ORGANICS, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
FOODMATCH, INC.
Counter_defendant:
DALMATIA IMPORT GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2016cv00857
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. THOMPSON, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS, INC., JOE D. HOLLIDAY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Thompson v. Overmeyer et al
as 4:2014cv01160
Petitioner:
Michael Alan Thompson
Respondent:
Michael Overmeyer and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44481
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
THOMPSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv78003
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING & BALLOW v. THOMPSON
as 2:2009mc00203
Plaintiff:
KING & BALLOW
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
THOMPSON et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv64659
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVEN THOMPSON and DEBRA LYNN THOMPSON
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
