Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael A. Baker v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08945
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Baker
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
BCS Business Consulting Services Pte. Ltd. v. Michael A. Baker et al
as 2:2019cv06914
Plaintiff:
BCS Business Consulting Services Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Michael A. Baker and BCS Pharma Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEV Service SA v. Michael A. Baker et al
as 2:2019cv04520
Plaintiff:
DEV SERVICE SA
Defendant:
Michael A. Baker and KATJA HOLM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Eddy et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv02267
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Eddy and Mark Eddy
Defendant:
Service Link, LLC, Michael M. Baker, Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Michael A. Baker v. Iur Urs Wehinger et al
as 2:2018cv05800
Defendant:
Dr. Urs Wehinger, Wehinger Kaelin Ferrari AG and Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eddy et al v. Federal Home Loan Morgage Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00400
Plaintiff:
Mark Eddy and Bobbie Eddy
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Morgage Corporation , Bank of America N.A. and Michael M. Baker
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Michael B Baker v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 2:2014cv02333
Plaintiff:
Michael B Baker
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and Does
McBride et al v. Fannie Mae et al
as 2:2014cv00776
Plaintiff:
Danny McBride and Pamela McBride
Defendant:
Fannie Mae, Onewest Bank FSB, Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Edward Baker v. LAPD et al
as 2:2013cv00191
Defendant:
Fareed Ahmad, LA Impact, LAPD and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Baker
Michael Edward Baker v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv05654
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Baker
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
