General Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Davis v. Chandler, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00439
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Chandler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00088
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Randall Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00186
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv03939
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Michael Anthnoy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10596
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL LEE DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davis v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00619
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv01550
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Defendant: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00530
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Defendant: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00167
Petitioner: Michael Lee Davis
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?