Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Davis v. Upton et al
as 5:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Davis
Defendant:
Warden Upton, Smithers, Barger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller et al v. Electronic Arts et al
as 2:2011mc00776
Plaintiff:
Samuel Michael Keller , Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr. , Bryan Bishop and others
Petitioner:
Big Sky Conference
Consol_plaintiff:
Craig Newsome , Danny Wimprine , Damien Rhodes and others
Defendant:
Electronic Arts , National Collegiate Athletic Association and Collegiate Licensing
Amicu:
James Brown and Herbert Anthony Adderley
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Davis v. Medina
as 11-1328
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden, Limon Corr Facility
Davis v. United States, et al
as 11-6072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HECTOR A. LEDEZMA, Warden and others
Righthaven LLC v. Software Farm, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00141
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Defendant:
Software Farm, Inc. and Michael L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv01136
Plaintiff:
Michael A Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Harley G Lappin, Hector A Ledezma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis v. Medina
as 1:2010cv01955
Petitioner:
Michael J. Davis
Respondent:
Angel Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Davis et al
as 6:2010cv01268
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Steven J. Davis, Michaelle D. Davis, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Davis v. Ledezma
as 10-6106
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL A DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
HECTOR A. LEDEZMA, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
