Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gary Houchens, et al v. Andy Beshear, et al
as 20-5644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA TIMBERLAKE, MILTON SEYMORE, GARY HOUCHENS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALVIS JOHNSON, LU YOUNG, ANDY BESHEAR, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv22062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowling v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as KYW/3:14-cv-00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowling
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv10581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv10491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arlin Grotius v. Riverside County, et al
as 12-55321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLIN GROTIUS
Defendant - Appellee:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, a political subdivision and Body Politic of the State of California, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision and body Politic or corporation division of the State of California, REGIN L. KEYES, Officer, Code Enforcement, in his individual and official capacities and others
Castro v. Martinez
as 5:2011cv01106
Attorney/Guardian Ad Litem:
Michael Bowles
Petitioner:
Maria De Lourdes Quezada Castro
Respondent:
Edgar Perez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 (b) Appl. for Return of Child Pursuant to Hague Convention
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
