Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Bibbs v. Sayre et al
as 4:2012cv05917
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
Michael C. Sayre and Laurie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Ellery et al
as 3:2012cv01084
Plaintiff:
Michael Romero
Defendant:
S. S. Ellery , P. Harman , B. Grenert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandigo v. Sayre et al
as 3:2012cv00980
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Sandigo
Defendant:
Michael C. Sayre, Gregory D. Lewis, Nancy Adam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv05127
Plaintiff:
Martin Rios
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, G. D. Lewis and Michael C. Sayre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carabay v. Sayre et al
as 3:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Jesse Carabay
Defendant:
Michael C. Sayre, Claire Williams, Kay Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Terflinger v. Michael Sayre, et al
as 11-15058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD TERFLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. SAYRE, M.D., THOMAS MARTINELLI, M.D., SUE ELLEN RISENHOOVER, R.N. and others
Michael Rochester v. Linda Rowe, et al
as 10-17772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAWN ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA ROWE, MD, CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Dr., MICHAEL C. SAYRE and others
Francisco Gonzalez v. D. Runnels, et al
as 10-17379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, MICHAEL C. SAYRE, Chief Medical Officer, M. MCLEAN and others
Bragg v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv04695
Plaintiff:
Julius Roy Bragg
Defendant:
A. Schwarzenegger, J. Clark Kelso, Michael C. Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Ashker v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-15526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD L. ASHKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Defendant:
JOE MCGRATH, RICHARD KIRKLAND, P. T. SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
