Cases 1 - 10 of 21
CURLEY v. ROOT INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CURLEY
Defendant:
ROOT INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
JONES v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2011cv02809
Petitioner:
HOWARD S. JONES, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY CO. PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLAVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GREEN v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2011cv01811
Petitioner:
EDWARD GREEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malloy v. Curley et al
as 1:2011cv00408
Petitioner:
Charles Malloy
Respondent:
Michael Curley and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUCKER v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2011cv00082
Petitioner:
LANCE RUCKER
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2011cv00065
Petitioner:
TERRANCE THOMPSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY , SHIRLEY MOORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLLAZO v. CURLEY et al
as 1:2011cv00006
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANGELO COLLAZO
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weigle v. Curley et al
as 3:2011cv00051
Respondent:
Michael Curley , Michael Salisbury and Karen Kuebler
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Weigle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malloy v. Curley
as 1:2010cv02585
Petitioner:
Charles Malloy
Respondent:
Michael Curley and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WELLS v. RAYMOND SOBINA/MICHAEL CURLEY et al
as 1:2010cv00280
Petitioner:
RICHARD K. WELLS
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA/MICHAEL CURLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
