Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McLaughlin v. Gus et al
as 3:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Raymond McLaughlin
Defendant:
Henry Kopel, Christopher Gus and Michael Dragon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pedrick et al v. DiBella Roofing, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00482
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pedrick, Wayne Maskiell, Michael Dragone and others
Defendant:
DiBella Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martone et al v. Coast to Coast Systems, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv04574
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martone, Wayne Maskiell, Michael Dragone and others
Defendant:
Coast to Coast Systems, Inc, Labor Only, Inc. and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pedrick et al v. Jericho Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03962
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pedrick, Wayne Maskiell, Michael Dragone and others
Defendant:
Jericho Construction Inc. and National Grange Mutual Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pedrick et al v. Burns Construction Corp.
as 1:2007cv01150
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pedrick, Wayne Maskiell, Michael Dragone and others
Defendant:
Burns Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pedrick et al v. Commercial Coatings & Maintenance, LLC
as 1:2007cv01100
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pedrick, Thomas Pedrick, Wayne Maskiell and others
Defendant:
Commercial Coatings & Maintenance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pedrick et al v. USG Roofing & Waterproofing
as 1:2007cv01111
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pedrick, Wayne Maskiell, Michael Dragone and others
Defendant:
USG Roofing & Waterproofing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pedrick et al v. A. Best Contracting Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv01095
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pedrick, Thomas Pedrick, Wayne Maskiell and others
Defendant:
A. Best Contracting Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
