Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05852
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Duane Harris v. Phillip L Browning
as 2:2010cv07964
Defendant:
Director Phillip L. Browning
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Michael Duane Harris v. District Court Judge George H. King et al
as 2:2010cv02842
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams and District Court Judge George H. King
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Michael Duane Harris v. Audrey B. Collins et al
as 2:2010cv02029
Defendant:
Judge Audrey B. Collins and Judge Ralph Zarefsky
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Michael Duane Harris v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2010cv00847
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
The People of the State of California
Michael Duane Harris v. Thomas P. O'Brian
as 2:2009cv04201
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
Thomas P. O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. Thomas P. O'Brien
as 2:2009cv01500
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
Thomas P. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. John A. Wagner et al
as 2:2009cv00837
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
John A. Wagner, Philip L. Browning and Grace Koa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Harris v. USDC-CAC
as 08-72418
:
In re: MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BARBARA BOXER
Michael Harris v. USDC-CAC
as 08-72419
:
In re: MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
DIANNE FEINSTEIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
