Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Steward v. Chandler et al
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Joseph Saul Steward
Defendant:
Matthew Chandler, Brian Scott Stover, Shelley Burger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malcom v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Melissa A. Malcom
Defendant:
Mark Sanchez, William Kelman, Michael Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Garcia v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Bowen
as 1:2018cv00269
Petitioner:
Michael Garcia
Respondent:
Mark Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
D.G. v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces , Harry Romero , Richard Williams and others
Plaintiff:
D. G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THI of New Mexico at Vida Encantada, LLC et al v. Garcia
as 1:2013cv00104
Defendant:
Michael Garcia
Plaintiff:
THI of New Mexico at Vida Encantada, LLC , THI of New Mexico, LLC and Fundamental Administrative Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Garcia v. Asset & Capital Management Group d/b/a United Financial Partners
as 1:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Asset & Capital Management Group d/b/a United Financial Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baker et al v. Seahorse Metalworks et al
as 1:2008cv00577
Plaintiff:
Mike Baker, Michael McDonald, Jerry P. Romero and others
Defendant:
Seahorse Metalworks, Moninger Steel Erectors Incorporated, Michael Garcia, - and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garcia v. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.,
as 1:2007cv01308
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia and Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc., and Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
