Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Peters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Dinah Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters et al v. Baylor College of Medicine et al
as 3:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor University and Baylor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Drexer
as 22-20329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Zoann Eckert Drexer, Medical Doctor
Peters v. Drexer
as 4:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Zoann Eckert Drexer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Harris
as 22-20094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott S. Harris, Supreme Court Clerk
Peters et al v. Harris
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Dalton Geoffrey Peters, Michael Geoffrey Peters and D.G.P.
Defendant:
Scott S Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-20507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, State of Texas and Dinah Hoffman, Mailroom Supervisor
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-40615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and State of Texas
Peters v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2021cv02699
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, The State Of Texas and Dinah Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
