Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Grace v. Hakala et al
as 1:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
William Grace
Defendant:
Michael Hakala, John Mattews, Becky Lizenbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Hakala et al
as 4:2010cv02056
Plaintiff:
James I. Toney
Defendant:
Michael Hakala, Debbie Vincent, William McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Crawford
as 1:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Bishop
Defendant:
Larry Crawford, George Lombardi, Chuck Dwyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Hakala
as 1:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Hakala, Unknown Graham and Unknown Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grace v. Sterling et al
as 1:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
William Grace
Defendant:
Kimberly Sterling, Terry Mitchell, Beckie Lizenbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Daniel v. Michael Hakala, et al
as 10-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Akeem Daniel
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Hakala, Larry Crawford, Steve Larkins and others
Daniel v. Hakala et al
as 4:2009cv00360
Plaintiff:
Martin Akeem Daniel
Defendant:
Michael Hakala, Larry Crawford, Steve Larkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keith Box v. Chuck Dwyer, et al
as 08-3777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith D. Box
Defendant - Appellee:
Chuck Dwyer, Correctional Superintendent, Phyllis Stanley, Medical Supervisor, Greg Rodriguez, Correctional Doctor and others
Neal Houston v. Charles Dwyer, et al
as 08-3733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neal Houston
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Dwyer, Director of Correctional Medical Services, Stephanie Kasting, Director of Medicine for Correctional Medical Services, Dr. Michael Hakala and others
Keith Box, et al v. Chuck Dwyer, et al
as 06-3759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith D. Box
Defendant - Appellee:
Chuck Dwyer, Correctional Superintendent, Phyllis Stanley, Medical Supervisor, Greg Rodriguez, Correctional Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
