Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kramer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv06064
Plaintiff:
Michael Harry Kramer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ciccotelli v. TriState Capital Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
TriState Capital Holdings, Inc., David L. Bonvenuto, Anthony J. Buzzelli and others
Harris v. Xerox Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv07587
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Moody's Corporation, Alec Usticke and Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
Harris v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv04018
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abraham et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11804
Plaintiff:
Victor Cantelmo, Lysette Rivera, Shirley R Rausher and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Neptune v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04815
Plaintiff:
Ralph M. Neptune
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correctional Facility Department, The New York State Department of Parole Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neptune v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03700
Plaintiff:
Ralph M. Neptune
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correctional Facility, The New York State Department of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv02383
Petitioner:
Michael Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Simon & Schumster, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03477
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Harris
Defendant:
Simon & Schumster, Inc. and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
