Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Henderson v. Holloway et al
as 3:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Barrios, Ashcroft, Fenske and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woody v. Henderson et al
as 4:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Frank Mayo and Michael Henderson
Plaintiff:
John Frederick Woody, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batman et al v. Perez et al
as 3:2020cv02298
Defendant:
David Perez and Yuma Union High School District
Plaintiff:
Joshua Torres, Susana Batman and Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Michael Henderson v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv05928
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
John Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Michael Mullicane v. Glendora Police Department, et al
as 17-56627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEWART MULLICANE
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENDORA POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL HENDERSON, GPD Detective; in individual and in official capacity, TIMOTHY STAAB, GPD Chief ; in individual and in official capacity and others
Julienne Mertens et al v. Directv, LLC
as 2:2017cv05602
Plaintiff:
Doug Bridgeforth, Robert Davis, Kelvin Forster and others
Defendant:
Directv, LLC
Young v. HENDERSON et al
as 4:2016cv04266
Plaintiff:
Alan T Young
Receiver:
SUSAN UECKER
Defendant:
THOMAS HENDERSON, MATTHEW HENDERSON, MICHAEL HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Henderson v Sing, et al
as 5:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
Sing, Hamilton, Alexander County Sheriff Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Burrell et al
as 5:2016cv01088
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
Ross Burrell and Richard Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. General Insulation Company
as 4:2015cv04821
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
General Insulation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
