Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 51 - 60 of 482
BOWERS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00951
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: AMY BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00899
Plaintiff: LORETTA FAYE JOHNSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DANIELS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00889
Plaintiff: MIASHAUN DANIELS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WADE v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00853
Plaintiff: JUNELLUS WADE
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
BAUTISTA v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00858
Plaintiff: MISTY J. BAUTISTA
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BACNIK v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00801
Plaintiff: ROBERT BACNIK
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
HOLCOMBE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00763
Plaintiff: KATIE LOUISE HOLCOMBE
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HOBSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00759
Plaintiff: FRANK W. HOBSON, III
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HOOD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00721
Plaintiff: SAMUEL C HOOD
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SCOTT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00709
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: LUCY M. SCOTT
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?