Cases 51 - 60 of 1,016
Campbell v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00040
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Campbell, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Minnix v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00038
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cathy K. Minnix
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowe v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00577
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Bowe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dennison v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00039
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Chelsea R. Dennison
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garcia v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00570
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Anthony Garcia
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tickle v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00068
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Linda Tickle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ratcliffe v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00567
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Toby A. Ratcliffe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Davenport v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01315
Plaintiff:
Sherry L. Davenport
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hoover v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01298
Plaintiff:
Colleen Renee Hoover
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Conner v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00552
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
John William Conner
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
