Cases 61 - 70 of 806
HARRIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01333
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JANICE M. HARRIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
STANSBERRY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01334
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RICK E. STANSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PRENTICE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01335
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN SUE ROBERTSON PRENTICE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILKINSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01308
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Movant:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HUGHES v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01306
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH K. HUGHES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
WALKER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01307
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RENEE J. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
EARLEY v ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01302
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. EARLEY, JR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WOOD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01293
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
TANYA WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
T.V.P. v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01294
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
T. V. P.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WALKER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01285
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
PAMELA K. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
