Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 482
MACKLIN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00666
Plaintiff: CHANDUL MACKLIN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
GRAVES v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00643
Plaintiff: JOHN GRAVES
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
MCLAUGHLIN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00621
Plaintiff: JEROME MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
NICHOLSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00627
Plaintiff: SHERITHA B. NICHOLSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RUFFIN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00595
Plaintiff: SHERRIE RUFFIN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
FREEZE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00597
Plaintiff: DONALD S. FREEZE, JR.
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HARRIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00598
Plaintiff: RANDALL HARRIS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
BROWN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00583
Plaintiff: LATRICE BROWN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
GUNNINGS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00562
Plaintiff: RONALD D. GUNNINGS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SKIPPER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00564
Plaintiff: RHONDA G. SKIPPER
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?