Cases 81 - 90 of 3,365
Fabre v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00076
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gloria J Fabre
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Soto v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00028
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Diana Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Burkeen v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00093
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Acting Cmr. S.S.A. Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Mark Houston Burkeen
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Enriquez v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00031
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Enriquez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Bihm v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Thomas Boyd Bihm
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Renteria v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00027
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Maria Renteria
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Wilkerson v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
Melissa Wilkerson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Turner v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv03806
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Turner
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stewart v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Beverly Stewart
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
