Cases 81 - 90 of 807
JANSEN v. ASTRUE
as 4:2012cv00097
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ANNA M. JANSEN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BIRGE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01159
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DARCIE BIRGE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JAMERSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01147
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DENISE JAMERSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NORTON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01148
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE NORTON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
TOLBERT et al v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01152
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN TOLBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TOWNE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01124
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JACKIE L. TOWNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
PITTMAN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01128
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CHANA R. PITTMAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HILL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01126
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
GARY A. HILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROWLEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01125
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. ROWLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
BRADLEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01127
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DANNY T. BRADLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
