Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ryan v. ELN Enterprises, et al
as 4:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ryan
Defendant:
ELN Enterprises, d/b/a Midwest CES, LLC, Jacob Johnsen, David Frandsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Ryan v. Garrana
as 4:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ryan
Defendant:
Sherief Hussein Garrana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ryan v. Saul
as 4:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Upchurch v. Tillman et al
as 4:2019cv00223
Defendant:
St. Louis Justice Center and Courtney Tillman
Plaintiff:
Michael James Upchurch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Clayton County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2017cv02343
Plaintiff:
Michael James Reynolds, Jr.
Defendant:
Clayton County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01554
Plaintiff:
Larry Barnes , Daniel Edmondson , Laura Tockman and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hagan v. Hagan et al
as 4:2015cv01083
Defendant:
Michael James Hagan , David Matthew Hagan , Arthur John Blickhan, III and others
Plaintiff:
F. Jane Hagan
Counter_claimant:
David Matthew Hagan and Michael James Hagan
Counter_defendant:
F. Jane Hagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hagan v. Hagan et al
as 2:2015cv00050
Defendant:
Michael James Hagan , David Matthew Hagan , Arthur John Blickhan, III and others
Plaintiff:
F. Jane Hagan
Counter_claimant:
David Matthew Hagan and Michael James Hagan
Counter_defendant:
F. Jane Hagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Estate of Mari L. Sturtevant
as 2:2015cv00034
Debtor:
Michael James Hagan and Michelle P Hagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osborne v. Brady
as 3:2015cv05020
Plaintiff:
Michael James Osborne
Defendant:
Housten Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
