Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kaseca v. Johnson et al
as 5:2021cv00538
Defendant:
John Raymond Johnson, Ezra DeLodge, Athea Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-James Kaseca
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Brown v. Rohrbough et al
as 5:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
Michael James Petisca Brown
Defendant:
Barry Rohrbough and Stephens County OK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Oklahoma County Detention Center
as 5:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Michael James Rodriguez
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Lawton Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2011cv00720
Plaintiff:
Michael James Morris
Defendant:
Lawton Correctional Facility, David Miller, Ms Polightes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Rudek
as 5:2011cv00245
Petitioner:
Michael James Lawrence
Respondent:
James Rudek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawrence v. Rudek et al
as 5:2010cv00462
Petitioner:
Michael James Lawrence
Respondent:
James Rudek and Atoka County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawrence v. Rudek et al
as 5:2010cv00390
Petitioner:
Michael James Lawrence
Respondent:
James Rudek and Oklahoma County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawrence v. Rudek et al
as 5:2010cv00389
Petitioner:
Michael James Lawrence
Respondent:
James Rudek and Oklahoma County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
International Union of Operating Engineers et al v. CP Kelco US, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
Local 627, AFL-CIO International Union of Operating Engineers, Jerry Britt, Michael Fisher and others
Defendant:
CP Kelco US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Prine v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 6:2009cv00203
Petitioner:
Michael James Prine
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
