Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LEVY v. UPMC HEALTH PLAN
as 2:2016cv01406
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEVY
Defendant:
UPMC HEALTH PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1332
PISKANIN v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2015cv02544
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. PISKANIN
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, MICHAEL LEVY and U.S. ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PISKANIN v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PISKANIN
Defendant:
JAMES B. MARTIN, KELLY L. BANACH, WILLIAM H. PLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PISKANIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv03609
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PISKANIN v. LEVY et al
as 2:2013cv00947
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEVY and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PISKANIN v. LEVY et al
as 2:2012cv07265
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEVY, ROBERT ZAUMER and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piskanin v. Martin et al
as 1:2012cv00908
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
James B Martin, Kelly L. Banach, Arlen Specter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PISKANIN v. U.S.ATTORNEY MICHAEL LEVY et al
as 3:2011cv00251
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
U.S.ATTORNEY MICHAEL LEVY, HONORABLE KEDLY L. BANACH, WILLIAM H. PLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PISKANIN v. LEVY et al
as 2:2011cv01703
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEVY, THE MORNING CALL INC., THE REPUBLICAN PARTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
