Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Dajon Smith
as 19-6206
Defendant / Appellant:
DAJON MICHAEL LEWIS SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Lewis
as 19-5144
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEWIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Doe, et al v. USA
as 17-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE and MICHAEL LEWIS ERICKSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carmen Amis v. James Twardesky, et al
as 14-2449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMEN AMIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TWARDESKY, BRADLEY ADKINS, WILLIAM BECHILL and others
Richard Thomason, et al v. Amalgamated Local No. 863, et al
as 14-3371
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMASON
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EVANS, MICHAEL LEWIS and MICHAEL OGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMALGAMATED LOCAL NO. 863 and INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
David Scott v. Bernadette Stone, et al
as 11-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNADETTE STONE, MICHAEL LEWIS, JAN BIGELOW and others
Paul Webster, IV v. City of Kent, Ohio, et al
as 10-4148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL T. WEBSTER, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KENT, OHIO, KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT, PATROLMAN MICHAEL LEWIS and others
Paul Webster, IV v. City of Kent, Ohio, et al
as 10-4149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL T. WEBSTER, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KENT, OHIO, KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT, PATROLMAN MICHAEL LEWIS and others
David Scott v. Bernadette Stone, et al
as 10-1156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNADETTE STONE, MICHAEL LEWIS, JAN BIGELOW and others
Richard Thomason, et al v. Amalgamated Local No. 863, et al
as 10-3078
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMASON
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EVANS, MICHAEL LEWIS and MICHAEL OGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMALGAMATED LOCAL NO. 863 and INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
