Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arron Michael Lewis v. M. Gutierrez
as 2:2022cv05832
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Respondent:
M. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Samantha Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04956
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael Wimberly v. J. Martin et al
as 2:2021cv05494
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Wimberly
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Martin, Sergeant D. Bolton and Associate Warden K. McQuaid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Richardson v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv08030
Defendant:
L. Mason, D.J. Williams, Augustine Kehinde and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Patrick L. Richardson and Patrick L. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gothier et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv03442
Plaintiff:
Jeri Gothier and Michael Lewis Gothier
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenyon Lee McLelland v. Michael Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv07613
Defendant:
Cross, Michael Lewis, Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Lee McLelland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faramarz Naeim v. Robert L. Wilkie et al
as 2:2019cv06126
Defendant:
Secretary ROBERT L. WILKIE, MICHAEL LEWIS, Acting Director ROBERT W. MCKENRICK and others
Plaintiff:
Faramarz Naeim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Darnell Black Sr v. Lyle et al
as 2:2019cv05728
Defendant:
Lyle, Michael Lewis, Vo and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Black, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
