Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Meudt et al
as 4:2021cv00556
Defendant:
Cpl. K. Howal, Officer E. Meudt and Bill Waybourn
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Treece et al
as 5:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Lillie Brown, Richard Wills and Gerald Thomas Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Synthes Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02886
Plaintiff:
Linda Lewis and Michael Lewis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turnbull v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2016cv00109
Petitioner:
Kris Michael Lewis Turnbull
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00843
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. USA
as 4:2014cv00461
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lewis v. Chandler
as 4:2014cv00057
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis
Respondent:
Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis et al v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03361
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis and Alta Lewis
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
