Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden, Norman Horton, Benjamin Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 4:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19-cr-701-2.
as 4:2022cv04270
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garrett v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02383
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00822
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Meudt et al
as 4:2021cv00556
Defendant:
Cpl. K. Howal, Officer E. Meudt and Bill Waybourn
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03436
Defendant:
Robert Herrera, Texas Department Of Crimainal Justicel and Brian Collier
Plaintiff:
Billy Martin, Michael Lewis and Ronald Catt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00719
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Henry Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Tempkins et al
as 6:2020cv00437
Defendant:
B Matthews, G Gilder and Aaron J Tempkins, Jr
Plaintiff:
Henry Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
