Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Smith v. Thomas et al
as 3:2026cv03196
Plaintiff:
Tiana Smith
Defendant:
Nathan Thomas, Stephen Kretschmer, Seth Bromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Long
as 4:2026cv00146
Plaintiff:
Reggie Pittman
Defendant:
Warden Michael Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Young et al
as 3:2026cv03164
Plaintiff:
Azariah Jackson
Defendant:
. Young, . Wilson, Elaine Worth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maza Lynch v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 26-1975
Plaintiff:
MAZA LYNCH
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, CHARLES OWENS, MELINDA EDDY, Warden and others
Tuttle v. Logan Correctional Center et al
as 3:2026cv03144
Plaintiff:
Ashley Noel Tuttle
Defendant:
Logan Correctional Center, . Henze, Steph Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drus v. Lawrence County, Ohio et al
as 1:2026cv00255
Defendant:
Cindy Kaye Eads, Lawrence County, Ohio, Jeff Lawless and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Litigant Marina V. Drus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Bean et al
as 2:2026cv00667
Plaintiff:
Michael Long
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Julie Williams, Gabriela Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification State Prison
as 2:2026cv00071
Petitioner:
Joel Keller Moss
Respondent:
Warden Michael Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Bramwell et al
as 3:2025cv03406
Defendant:
Seth Bramwell, Evan Brunner, Jacob Dietrich and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Reed et al
as 5:2025cv00281
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hines
Defendant:
David Reed, Brant C. Donaldson, A. Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
