Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LORUSSO v. DESANTIS et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LORUSSO
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY and CENTURION MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LORUSSO v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LORUSSO
Respondent:
FLORIDA SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, ASHLEY MOODY and CENTURION MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LoRusso v. Starbucks Company
as 2:2022cv01770
Plaintiff:
Michael LoRusso
Defendant:
Starbucks Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LoRusso v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Michael LoRusso and Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LoRusso v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas)
as 8:2021cv02424
Plaintiff:
Michael LoRusso
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LoRusso v. Gulfport Police Department et al
as 8:2021cv02253
Petitioner:
Michael LoRusso
Respondent:
Gulfport Police Department, Chief of Police, Steve Weatherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LoRusso v. Moody
as 8:2021cv02219
Plaintiff:
Michael LoRusso
Defendant:
Ashley Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
