Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Lela v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv04058
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Thomas J. Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Ioan Lela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05437
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Miller and Miriam Miller
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Sood et al
as 4:2017cv04119
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
K Sood, Steve Gans and Stephanie J Dorethy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Buddyz McHenry, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv50151
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Buddyz McHenry, Inc. and John Beuckens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Moore v. X5511 Hill Markham Officer et al
as 1:2015cv01961
Plaintiff:
Clifton R Moore
Defendant:
X5511 Hill Markham Officer, Thomas J. Dart, Michael Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv05285
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Brooks
Defendant:
Victor Thomas, Michael Miller and Frank Arce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv02131
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitehead-Bey v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2012cv01128
Plaintiff:
Ricky Whitehead-Bey
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, Tony Prepwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2012cv00503
Plaintiff:
Tavares Hunt
Defendant:
County of Cook, Cook County department of Corrections, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Tavares Hunt
Defendant:
County of Cook, Cook County Department of Corrections, Tony Prepwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
