Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Boyce v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv00580
Petitioner:
Hillary Randolph Boyce
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Thomas Decker, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Welsh v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00541
Petitioner:
Winston Welsh
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cheku v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv00527
Petitioner:
Babu Cheku
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KAWAS v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01458
Petitioner:
ABDEL-KAREEM KAWAS
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and JAMES MOONEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MAMMADOVA et al v. DECKER et al
as 3:2008cv00501
Petitioner:
Esmira Mammadova and Tengiz Mammadov
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker, Thomas R. Decker, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McDonald v. Decker et al
as 1:2008cv00496
Petitioner:
Carrington McDonald
Respondent:
Thomas Decker and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zheng v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00223
Petitioner:
Luo Fei Zheng and Luo Fei Zheng
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TRELLI v. DEPARMNT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 2:2008cv00448
Petitioner:
SUSHI MA TRELLI
Respondent:
DEPARMNT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
