Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Ronnie Lyles v. Mary Ann Lemmon, et al
as 10-30276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN VIAL LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
Avila v. Lappin et al
as 4:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Primitivo Avila
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Michael Mukasey, Dan Joslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belloc et al v. Mukasey
as 4:2009cv00058
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Belloc
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Peter Mrina v. Michael Mukasey, et al
as 09-10689
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER MRINA
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, Attorney General, JOHN SOURKARIS, Director Post Order Detention Unit, U.S. (ICE), NURIA PRENDES, Director of Detention and Field Operations Dallas, Texas (ICE) and others
James Rockett v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 09-30536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROCKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Director and others
MARSHALL v. CHANDLER et al
as 1:2009cv00100
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr
Respondent:
Rodney W. Chandler, Harley G Lappin, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lyles v. Lemmon, et al
as 09-30105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN V LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
Jose Luis Belloc v.s.Michael Mukasey et. al.,
as 4:2009cv00001
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Belloc
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey and USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Abdelhaik v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv03734
Petitioner:
Elghachani Abdelhaik
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lyles v. Lemmons, et al
as 08-31208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN V LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
