Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Doissaint v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00584
Petitioner:
Volsaint Doissaint
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Armen Gyurdzhiyants v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 8:2008cv00344
Petitioner:
Armen Gyurdzhiyants
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, James Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Andrew v. Clark et al
as 2:2008cv00480
Petitioner:
Jude H Andrew
Respondent:
Neil Clark, Michael Mukasey and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Glass v. McFadden et al
as 3:2008cv01585
Petitioner:
Leigh-Davis Glass
Respondent:
Robert E. McFadden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tereser A. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00511
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00481
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00464
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Yin Dzun Zhang v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 8:2008cv00240
Petitioner:
Yin Dzun Zhang
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, John Torre and James T Hayes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
