Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Thompson et al v. Masterson et al
as 5:2023cv04120
Plaintiff:
Mike Thompson and Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Ty Masterson and Daniel Hawkins
Intervenor:
Ethan Corson, Dinah Sykes, Marci Francisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Murphy
as 23-30610
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Michael Murphy
MURPHY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MURPHY and MARIE MURPHY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00761
Plaintiff:
Jones, Matthew Jones, Micheal Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Steve Snyder-Hill, et al v. The Ohio State University
as 21-3981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE SNYDER-HILL, RONALD MCDANIEL, DAVID MULVIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Christine Alire, et al v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 21-55752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINE ALIRE
Plaintiff:
SHADI HAYDEN, JERRY HO, WILLIAM HANNUM and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE GAP, INC.
Defendant:
THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC., SEPHORA USA, INC., ADVANCE AUTO PARTS and others
Murphy v. First American Title
as 21-30351
Defendant / Appellee:
First American Title Guaranty Company, formerly known as United General Title Insurance Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Michael Murphy
James Murphy v. Thomas Welhelm, et al
as 21-35367
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. WELHELM, M.D. and HOOD RIVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Defendant:
CITY OF HOOD RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL MURPHY, MD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
