Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Daniel Warren v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 20-3561
Defendant:
THOMAS C. CREIGHTON, III, LISA SCHELLER, COUNTY OF LEHIGH
and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH WILSON, CARL HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS
and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WARREN
OSBORNE v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv15092
Defendant:
ETHICON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OSBORNE
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
SPECIAL POLICE ORGANIZATION OF NEW JERSEY v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv08444
Plaintiff:
JABREE BELL, KYLE BROWN, TUWAN FLOYD
and others
Defendant:
ANTHONY AMBROSE, CITY OF NEWARK, HARRY ROES (1-10)
and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Walker v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01896
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, Randall P. Seidl
and others
Plaintiff:
R. Scott Walker
Scarantino v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01827
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, David C Mahoney
and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Scarantino
Joel Rosenfeld IRA v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01819
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, David C Mahoney
and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Joel Rosenfeld IRA v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01819
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, David C Mahoney
and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. OSBORNE et al
as 2:2018cv01078
Defendant:
BLUSKY RESTORATION CONTRACTORS, LLC, PHILLIP HAMMETT, MICHAEL CALVIN
and others
Plaintiff:
CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Valette Clark, et al v. Kevin Clark, et al
as 16-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VALETTE J. CLARK, MICHAEL CLARK, PHILLIP CLARK
and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN D. CLARK, M.D., SHARON E. CLARK, OPHTHLMOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF OSBORNE INC
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
