Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hogan v. USA
as 3:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Michael T. Hogan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
ISCO Industries, Inc. v. Grants Mill Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
ISCO Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Grants Mill Company, Inc. and Michael T. Deason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrick v. Paul
as 5:2021cv00193
Respondent:
Warden David Paul, FMC Lexington and BOP
Petitioner:
Michael T. Barrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrick v. Paul
as 5:2021cv00123
Petitioner:
Michael T. Barrick
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barnett et al v. Piper Trucking & Leasing, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Sheila R. Barnett
Defendant:
Piper Trucking & Leasing, LLC, Michael T. Ward, Fraley & Schilling, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krueger v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Krueger
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenblatt v. General Cable Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Defendant:
General Cable Corporation, Sallie B. Bailey, Ned Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Secretary of Labor v. Mike Osbourn Lawn Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00528
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
Mike Osbourn Lawn Care, Inc. and Michael T. Osbourn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eley v. General Cable Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Lonnie E. Eley
Defendant:
General Cable Corporation , The Retirement Plans Finance Committee of General Cable Corporation , The Retirement Plans Administrative Committee of General Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
