Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Vorkapich v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2023cv00827
Plaintiff:
Michael Vorkapich
Defendant:
Michigan State University, Alan Haller and Ashton Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simmons v. Michigan State Houseing Development Authority et al
as 2:2023cv10448
Plaintiff:
Jelisa Simmons
Defendant:
Michigan State Houseing Development Authority, RPI Management Inc. and Joy West Manor
Stocck v. Unknown Parties et al
as 1:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
David Stocck
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Unknown Parties and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Michigan State Police et al
as 2:2019cv13082
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Michigan State Police, Judge Kathleen M. McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Duanne Tyrone Barber
Arsenault v. Devos et al
as 2:2019cv11013
Defendant:
Ascension, Michigan State University and Secretary Betsy Devos
Plaintiff:
John MIchael Arsenault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Blakesley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan et al
as 2:2019cv10295
Plaintiff:
Raymond Blakesley
Defendant:
William McMullen, DEA US Drug Enforcement Administration, Michigan State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakesley v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10299
Defendant:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Renay Blakesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cook v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10135
Defendant:
Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen, Michigan State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. William et al
as 2:2019cv10125
Defendant:
Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen, Michigan State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pittman v. Pittman et al
as 2:2017cv12572
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Mark J. Cavanaugh, Nanci C. Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Keyon Pittman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
