Cases 11 - 14 of 14
Richard C. Weber Jr. v. Ohio State Kaskalni et al
as 2:2018cv00745
Defendant:
Canton Toudrashi Unsled Sencelli, Colorado State University Sencelli, Creighton Unisled Sencelli and others
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Weber, Jr.
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Defendant:
James Reynolds, II, Cancer Fund of America Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Breast Cancer Financial Assistance Fund, Cancer Support Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Receiver:
Receivership Management Incorporated
Petitioner:
First Tennessee Bank NA, Associated Community Services Incorporated and Central Processing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
State Treasurer of the State of Michigan et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00809
Defendant:
ABN Amro Incorporated, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michigan Judges Retirement System, Michigan State Police Retirement System, State Employees Retirement System and others
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of et al v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 3:2009cv03651
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of and State of Tennessee, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Indiana, State of Michigan, State of Montana, State of New Hampshire, State of New Mexico, State of New York, S
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
