Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ROSE v. UNKOWN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENT et al
as 5:2019cv06018
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW C. LYNCH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
ROSE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER
as 5:2019cv01260
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
CAIN v. MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER
as 2:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
KORAN CAIN
Defendant:
MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER, SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE, MR. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Francois v. Mid Atlantic Program Service Center et al
as 1:2016cv01451
Defendant:
Elaine G. Daniels, Stephen G. Demarko, Beatrice M. Disman and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Francois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
VIHLIDAL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE OF DISABILITIES AND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS et al
as 2:2015cv00721
Plaintiff:
DARLA A. VIHLIDAL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE OF DISABILITIES AND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW and THE PAYMENT CENTER MID ATLANTIC SERVICE CENTER OF PROCESSING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Francois et al v. Mid Atlantic Program Service Center et al
as 1:2014cv04002
Defendant:
Steven G. DeMarco, Beatrice Disman, Joyce Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen N. Francois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Louis Cope v. Social Security Administration, et al
as 13-1748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS COPE
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, HHS ADMINISTRATION COMMISIONER, BEATRICE DISMAN, SSA Regml Admin Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
