Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Midwest Business Capital v. Mary K. Martinez et al
as 8:2021cv01517
Plaintiff:
Midwest Business Capital
Defendant:
Mary K. Martinez, Thomas R. Martinez, JKMT Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Midwest Business Capital v. Patricia Ortiz et al
as 2:2021cv07325
Petitioner:
Midwest Business Capital, a division of United Midwest Savings Bank, an Ohio banking institute
Plaintiff:
Midwest Business Capital
Defendant:
Patricia Ortiz, B and P Home Services Inc. a California corporation doing business as Maid Right of Santa Clarita and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Midwest Business Capital, a division of United Midwest Savings Bank, an Ohio banking institute
as 2:2021cv07309
Plaintiff:
Midwest Business Capital, a division of United Midwest Savings Bank, an Ohio banking institute
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725
Midwest Business Capital v. Daniel S. Tang Optometric Corp., et al
as 2:2020cv01927
Plaintiff:
Midwest Business Capital, a division of United Midwest Savings Bank, an Ohio banking institute and Midwest Business Capital
Defendant:
Daniel S. Tang Optometric Corporation, a California corporation, Daniel Tang, Daniel S. Tang Optometric Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. The First National Bank of Vandalia et al
as 3:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
First National Bank of Vandalia, Midwest Business Capital and Illinois Housing Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
United States of America v. First National Bank of Vandalia et al
as 3:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
First National Bank of Vandalia, Midwest Business Capital and Illinois Housing Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Midwest Business Capital v. Steele
as 1:2011cv00988
Plaintiff:
Midwest Business Capital
Defendant:
Channing W. Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
