Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(HC) Aguilar v. Cates
as 3:2021cv00909
Petitioner:
Miguel C. Aguilar
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Aguilar v. Cates
as 1:2021cv00752
Petitioner:
Miguel C. Aguilar
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daronta Lewis v. Stuart Sherman, et al
as 21-15452
Defendant / Appellee:
SASIN AGLIA, C/O at CSATF, CHRISTOPHER BELTRAN, Supervisor at CSATF, CURTIS HEVENER, C/O at CSATF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS
COSME v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66422
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL C COSME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARATTINI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87825
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL C. CARATTINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C. v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv00300
Defendant:
CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company and Cirrus Logic Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan
Plaintiff:
Miguel C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cruz v. Weather Mark Group, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv07010
Plaintiff:
Miguel C Cruz
Defendant:
Weather Mark Group, LLC and Mark O Stern
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Castaneda v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2014cv01949
Petitioner:
Miguel C. Castaneda
Respondent:
N.L. Montgomery and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
-RZ Entertainment by J&J v. Miguel C Navarro, et al
as 2:2001cv06553
Movant:
Creative Recovery Concepts Inc
Defendant:
Does and Miguel C Navarro
Plaintiff:
Entertainment by J & J Inc
Unknown:
Robert M Takasugi
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
