Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Douglas v. Robertson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Douglas
Defendant:
Robertson County Sheriff's Office, Hearne, TX Police Department, Police Chief Thomas Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Home Depot
as 23-20457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Miguel Vasquez
Defendant / Appellee:
Home Depot USA, Incorporated
Vasquez v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2021cv03609
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vasquez
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Santiago Lopez-Chavez
as 20-50882
Defendant / Appellant:
Santiago Lopez-Chavez, also known as Natilio Vazquez-Chavez, also known as Andres Maldonado Lopez, also known as Fidel Garcia Lopez, also known as Andre Garcia Maldonado, also known as Miguel Vasquez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Vasquez v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2019cv03703
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vasquez
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jose Vasquez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20575
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL VASQUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Vasquez v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00690
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Vasquez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Tokyo Japanese Steak House LLC
as 4:2014cv02436
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Vasquez
Defendant:
Tokyo Japanese Steak House LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Vasquez v. Wathen DO NOT DOCKET. CASE TRANSFERRED TO BROWNSVILLE DIVISION UNDER CASE NUMBER 1:13CV242.
as 2:2013cv00406
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Vasquez, Jr
Respondent:
Richard Wathen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Stephens
as 1:2013cv00242
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Vasquez, Jr
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
