Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-14786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Set Free Community Development Corporation v. Riley et al
as 2:2010cv01769
Plaintiff:
Set Free Community Development Corporation
Defendant:
Robert Riley, Arthur Green, John Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Powell v. Alabama State of et al
as 2:2008cv01345
Plaintiff:
Doris Powell
Defendant:
Alabama State of, Jefferson County Election Commission, Alan King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dumonde v. State of Alabama, et al
as 5:2008cv01163
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant:
State of Alabama, State of Alabama, United States and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Buchannon v. Hale
as 2:2008cv00945
Plaintiff:
Charles J Buchannon
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Mike Hale, Mike Hale and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coughlin v. Cahill et al
as 2:2007cv00443
Plaintiff:
Bettye L Coughlin
Defendant:
Robert Cahill, David Litenstein, Mike Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:1975cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
